The Problem With One-Size-Fits-All Thinking

When most people hear “blockchain,” they think Bitcoin. That’s like hearing “vehicle” and only thinking of cars, forgetting about boats, planes, and bicycles.

Here’s what nobody explains: There are different types of blockchains for different needs. Using Bitcoin’s blockchain for your medical records would be like using a megaphone for a private conversation – technically possible, but probably not ideal.

Understanding these differences helps you spot which projects make sense and which are trying to force blockchain where it doesn’t belong.

The Restaurant Analogy

Think of different blockchains like different types of restaurants:

Public Blockchain = Food Court

  • Anyone can eat there
  • Everyone sees what everyone orders
  • No reservations needed
  • Fully transparent pricing
  • Nobody owns it exclusively

Private Blockchain = Members-Only Club

  • Need invitation or membership
  • Only members see what happens inside
  • Controlled guest list
  • Private pricing
  • Clear ownership

Hybrid Blockchain = Restaurant with Public Dining and Private Rooms

  • Public area for everyone
  • Private rooms for special occasions
  • Mix of transparency and privacy
  • Flexible access control

Consortium Blockchain = Restaurant Co-op

  • Multiple restaurants share a kitchen
  • Each has a say in operations
  • Shared costs and benefits
  • Limited to partner restaurants

Now let’s see why you’d choose each one.

Public Blockchains: The Town Square

What They Are: Open to anyone with an internet connection. Like a public park – no entrance fee, no permission needed.

Examples:

  • Bitcoin (the first and most famous)
  • Ethereum (the programmable one)
  • Cardano, Solana, Polkadot

Best Used For:

  • Cryptocurrency (money needs to be universally accessible)
  • Global applications (DeFi, NFTs)
  • Anything requiring maximum trust and transparency
  • Censorship resistance

Real Example: Maria in Venezuela uses Bitcoin because her government can’t freeze it, banks can’t deny access, and it works regardless of political situation.

Advantages:

  • No single point of control
  • Completely transparent
  • Highly secure (thousands of validators)
  • Censorship resistant
  • Open innovation

Disadvantages:

  • Slower transactions
  • Higher fees
  • Everything is public
  • Energy intensive (some types)
  • Can’t easily fix mistakes

Think Of It Like: Wikipedia – anyone can contribute, everyone can verify, nobody owns it.

Private Blockchains: The Corporate Solution

What They Are: Controlled by specific organizations. Like a company intranet – powerful, but restricted access.

Examples:

  • Hyperledger (IBM’s enterprise solution)
  • R3 Corda (used by banks)
  • Most corporate blockchains

Best Used For:

  • Internal company operations
  • Supply chain between known partners
  • Medical records within hospital network
  • Financial settlements between banks

Real Example: Walmart uses private blockchain to track food. When contaminated spinach appears, they can trace it to the exact farm in seconds, not days.

Advantages:

  • Very fast transactions
  • Cheap or free to use
  • Privacy for sensitive data
  • Can reverse transactions if needed
  • Energy efficient

Disadvantages:

  • Requires trust in controlling entity
  • Not censorship resistant
  • Limited innovation
  • Defeats some blockchain purposes
  • Can be shut down

Think Of It Like: A company’s internal database, but with better audit trails and shared control.

Hybrid Blockchains: Best of Both Worlds

What They Are: Combine public and private elements. Like having both a public Twitter account and private DMs.

Examples:

  • Dragonchain (Disney’s creation)
  • XinFin
  • Some government projects

Best Used For:

  • Healthcare (private data, public verification)
  • Voting (private ballots, public counting)
  • Business contracts (private terms, public proof)
  • Regulatory compliance

Real Example: A hospital keeps patient data private but publishes anonymized research data publicly. Patients control what’s shared.

Advantages:

  • Flexible privacy controls
  • Efficient but verifiable
  • Regulatory friendly
  • Customizable access
  • Balances transparency and privacy

Disadvantages:

  • More complex to implement
  • Still somewhat centralized
  • Newer, less tested
  • Can be confusing for users

Think Of It Like: A smartphone – some apps are public (social media), some are private (banking), all on one device.

Consortium Blockchains: The Industry Alliance

What They Are: Controlled by a group of organizations. Like a trade association – members only, but no single boss.

Examples:

  • Energy Web Chain (utility companies)
  • IBM Food Trust (food industry)
  • B3i (insurance companies)

Best Used For:

  • Industry-wide standards
  • Competitor collaboration
  • Shared infrastructure
  • Cross-company processes

Real Example: Major shipping companies use TradeLens to share container tracking. Competitors cooperate because everyone benefits from visibility.

Advantages:

  • Faster than public chains
  • More decentralized than private
  • Industry-specific features
  • Shared costs
  • Trust among known parties

Disadvantages:

  • Limited to consortium members
  • Governance can be complex
  • May exclude smaller players
  • Still requires some trust

Think Of It Like: Airlines sharing flight data – competitors cooperating for mutual benefit.

The Pizza Chain Joke (But Seriously)

Why “Pizza Chains” in the title? Because blockchain developers love pizza (Bitcoin’s first real purchase was pizza), but also because it illustrates a point:

Just like pizza chains, different blockchains serve different tastes:

  • Domino’s (Bitcoin): Reliable, everywhere, does one thing well
  • California Pizza Kitchen (Ethereum): Fancier, more options, costs more
  • Local Pizzeria (Private Chain): Exclusive, customized, neighborhood only
  • Pizza Co-op (Consortium): Local shops sharing ingredients

The key is choosing the right chain for your needs.

How to Choose the Right Blockchain Type

Ask yourself:

1. Who needs access?

  • Everyone → Public
  • Just our company → Private
  • Our industry → Consortium
  • Mixed needs → Hybrid

2. What’s more important?

  • Maximum trust → Public
  • Maximum speed → Private
  • Balance → Hybrid/Consortium

3. What’s your data sensitivity?

  • Public information → Public chain
  • Trade secrets → Private chain
  • Mixed data → Hybrid

4. What’s your budget?

  • Limited budget → Public (shared costs)
  • Enterprise budget → Private (control costs)

Common Misconceptions

“Private blockchains aren’t real blockchains”
They are – just with different tradeoffs. Like how intranets are still “real internet.”

“Public always means no privacy”
Not true – public blockchains can have privacy features (like Zcash or Monero).

“You have to pick one type forever”
Nope – many projects use multiple chains or migrate between types.

Your Blockchain Type Action Plan

  1. Identify the Use Case: What problem are you solving?
  2. Determine Access Needs: Who needs to participate?
  3. Evaluate Privacy Requirements: What can be public vs. private?
  4. Consider the Tradeoffs: Speed vs. decentralization vs. cost
  5. Start Simple: Most people should start with public chains and explore from there

Remember: There’s no “best” blockchain type – only the best for your specific needs. It’s like arguing whether planes are better than boats. Depends on whether you’re crossing an ocean or a street.

Next Step: Now that you know the types, let’s understand how they reach agreement in “Consensus Mechanisms: How Computers Agree Without Arguing”.